Industry Careers
  • Posted by Michael Pinchera at
    12:00AM 05/14/2012 1 Comments

    Grab New Talent Here!

    So, you need a job. Or you want a new job. But the employment market stinks, right? That’s what the TV and the Web report almost hourly (so we won’t forget).

    Well, the situation doesn’t stink everywhere. Richard Florida and Charlotta Mellander ranked the top U.S. cities as far as their relative attractiveness to recent college grads seeking gainful employment.

    Before we get to the rankings, let’s mix this up and make the data, perhaps, a bit more interesting. From the list of the top 10 U.S. cities for new college grads, the following areas are also each home to one of the 10 largest MPI chapters (MPI size rank in parenthesis).

    1. San Francisco—Oakland—Fremont, Calif. (MPI Northern California Chapter—No. 1, tied)

    2. San Jose—Sunnyvale—Santa Clara, Calif. (MPI Northern California Chapter—No. 1, tied)

    3. New York—Newark—Edison, N.Y., N.J., Penn. (MPI Greater New York Chapter—No. 5)

    ...

    10. Boston—Cambridge—Quincy, Mass., N.H. (MPI New England Chapter—No. 9)

    Extrapolate away. I look at those destinations and surmise they’re most likely to be home to the most new college grads anyway just based on proximity to many notable college soils. I’m, of course, also dismayed to see the southern U.S. fall behind in another category.

    Additional destinations thriving for new college grads include Champaign-Urbana, Ill.; Durham, N.C.; Gainesville, Fla.; Ithaca, N.Y.; and Ann Arbor, Mich.

    Image (CC) pigeonpie



  • Posted by Jason Hensel at
    12:00AM 04/24/2012 5 Comments

    Is Hospitality Management a Useless Major?

    The Daily Beast recently ran a story titled "The 13 Most Useless Majors, From Philosophy to Journalism." Guess which field came in at No. 10. That's right, hospitality management

    Here are the stats cited as to why it came in at that spot:

    Unemployment, recent grad: 9.1 percent
    Unemployment, experienced grad: 5.7 percent
    Earnings, recent grad: US$32,000
    Earnings, experienced grad: US$53,000
    Projected growth, 2010–2020: +8 percent
    Related occupation: Lodging manager

    "This year we started with new research (PDF) from Georgetown University—which drew from two years of census data to determine the prospects for myriad majors—to narrow down our list to more than three dozen popular college majors," The Daily Beast reported. "We also used data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, equally weighing the following categories to determine current and future employment and earnings potential for our final ranking: recent graduate employment, experienced graduate employment, recent graduate earnings, experienced graduate earnings and projected growth in total number of jobs, 2010-2020." 

    Obviously, we feel differently and believe that the hospitality industry greases the wheels of world production. So, to say that it's a useless major is short-sighted and ignorant of the industry's broad-reaching economic facts.

    We're sure you have some thoughts. Please let us know of them in the comments.  




  • Posted by Jason Hensel at
    12:00AM 04/09/2012 1 Comments

    Why You Should be a Narcissist During Job Interviews

    Narcissism, a trait considered obnoxious in most circumstances, actually pays off big-time in the short-term context of a job interview, according to a new study to be published in the Journal of Applied Social Psychology.

    Narcissists scored much higher in simulated job interviews than non-narcissists, researchers found. They pointed to narcissists’ innate tendency to promote themselves, in part by engaging and speaking at length, which implied confidence and expertise even when they were held to account by expert interviewers.

    “This is one setting where it’s OK to say nice things about yourself and there are no ramifications. In fact, it’s expected,” said Peter Harms, assistant professor of management at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and a co-author of the study. “Simply put, those who are comfortable doing this tend to do much better than those who aren’t.”

    The two-part study examined the effectiveness of the types of behaviors that narcissists exhibit—which would be typically seen as maladjusted—in the narrow context of an interview. In the first part, 72 participants were videotaped in a simulated job-applicant setting. As expected, narcissists were more likely to self-promote. However, it was when expert interviewers challenged applicants that narcissists started behaving in unexpected ways, Harms says.

    While normal individuals backed off of their self-promotion tactics when held accountable, narcissists actually increased their attempts to make themselves look better.

    “When feeling challenged, they tend to double down,” Harms said. “It’s as if they say ‘Oh, you’re going to challenge me? Then I’m not just great, I’m fantastic.’ And in this setting, it tended to work.”

    In the study’s second part, 222 raters evaluated videos of applicants with similar job skills and varying levels of narcissism. The raters consistently awarded chronic self-promoters—who spoke quickly and at length and who used ingratiation tactics such as smiling, gesturing and complimenting others—far more positive evaluations.

    Meanwhile, equally qualified applicants who tended to rely on tactical modesty scored lower, according to the study.

    “This shows that what is getting (narcissists) the win is the delivery,” Harms said. “These results show just how hard it is to effectively interview, and how fallible we can be when making interview judgments. We don’t necessarily want to hire narcissists, but might end up doing so because they come off as being self-confident and capable.”

    For interviewers, the study’s findings mean they must become aware of the tactics used by narcissists, Harms says—and, if necessary, avoid selecting people who chronically use self-promotion and ingratiation, unless those behaviors are appropriate for the position.

    “On the whole, we find very little evidence that narcissists are more or less effective workers. But what we do know is that they can be very disruptive and destructive when dealing with other people on a regular basis. If everything else is equal, it probably is best to avoid hiring them.”

    (Story materials provided by the University of Nebraska-Lincoln/Steve Smith.)




  • Posted by David Basler at
    12:00AM 04/02/2012 2 Comments

    Need a Job? Change the Way You Network

    While the unemployment rate (8.3 percent) is the lowest it has been in three years in the United States, the same rate in the European Union is 10.8 percent—the highest the 17-nation collective has seen since the Euro was introduced in 1999. 

    Easy translation: No matter where you live in the world, unemployment is an issue. 

    When the EU jobless rates were released this morning (4/2), it's no coincidence that the Harvard Business Review posted as their "Tip of the Day" a great article called "Finding a Job by Changing the Way You Network," by Bill Barnett. In it, Barnett offers three really simple, yet very important tips for anyone looking for any employment in any field. If you're in between jobs or even if you're looking to expand your opportunities, take a look at these tips, put them into action and build a solid foundation for success.


    Tip #1: Expand Your Possibilities. As HBR says, "You have more contacts than you think." Log on to all your social networks and find past colleagues who know your capabilities. Call on former classmates or clients. If you have a track record of volunteering, contact those you have shared experiences with and tell them your looking for a new career. You'll be amazed how quickly good things will come your way if you enlist more than just your own eyes and ears in the search process. The most important piece is once you make contact with these people, "ask for introductions to others" that they work with. It's "grass roots LinkedIn" at its finest—an unpublished opportunity could be waiting for you through a friend of a friend.


    Tip #2: Don't Converse, Discuss. "Approach meetings as conversations, not interviews." When you connect with your contacts, ask them about more than just job possibilities. If it's a different industry or a different part of the industry you are in, ask about how to best succeed and how to get the most out of the opportunity.


    Tip #3: Record it. "Connecting with many people can be complicated." HBR recommends you take notes during the meeting and write down what you learned from your conversation and most importantly, write down action items for what you are going to do with what you learned. Take a proactive approach to build on what you learn from your contacts.


    BONUS Tip #4: Use Your MPI Membership to Your Advantage. One of the many perks of MPI membership is exclusive access to the MPI career portal. I just checked and you currently have access to more than 225 meeting and event industry jobs. Here's the link: http://qa.mpiweb.org/portal/career

    Check it out!




  • Posted by Jason Hensel at
    12:00AM 03/21/2012 0 Comments

    Corporate Executive: Not a Desired Job Anymore

    We talk a lot about getting a seat at the table, being part of the C-suite, etc. However, maybe we should be talking more about how to be an entrepreneur or freelance worker. 

    According to a survey of more than 1,000 people, more than half aspired to be entrepreneurs or work as an independent, while not a single respondent aspired to be a corporate executive.

    The results of the Intelligent Office survey point to an evolution of work styles and the development of a different type of worker that is defined by a desire for mobility and flexibility typically found in the entrepreneur and/or independent business owner.

    “We believe there is a paradigm shift happening in our culture as it relates to work style,” said Tom Camplese, COO for Intelligent Office. “We have been watching this shift take place over the course of the last few years at Intelligent Office by talking with entrepreneurs, business owners, and mobile executives on a daily basis. The Work IQ survey put this into hard numbers.”

    Additional highlights include:

    • Nearly 65 percent of survey participants desire to work as an entrepreneur or independent
    • 61 percent of people surveyed desire more flexible work hours than the traditional 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    • People are looking for a new balance—work hard/play hard; Nearly half of the respondents want a work hard/play hard work-life balance
    • Technology remains an invaluable resource to more than 45 percent of the respondents
    • Overwhelmingly, people aspire to have more mobility in their work life
    • 66 percent responded that they aspire to have a laptop or tablet that affords them freedom and mobility

    “What we continue to hear from people is that they increasingly need and expect services that will help them grow and be more successful, but they want those services to match this new work style—flexible and mobile,” Camplese said. “Overall, they are seeking more balance and freedom in everything, including the services that support their business efforts.”

    Do you agree with these findings? Would you rather be an entrepreneur/independent than a member of the C-suite? Or maybe that decision isn't mutually exclusive? Please let us know in the comments.  




  • Posted by Jason Hensel at
    12:00AM 03/20/2012 5 Comments

    Meeting Planner Ranked Best Job

    The meeting profession provides a high level of satisfaction for many professionals, and now U.S. News & World Report has named Meeting, Convention & Event Planner as No. 1 on its recent “Best Business Jobs of 2012” list.

    The report cites strong job satisfaction scores and projects significant growth within the profession over the next decade (43.7 percent between 2010 and 2020).

    “I’ve been a meeting planner for 22 years. It’s terrific,” said Judith Flanagan, CMP, CMM, an independent planner from Haddonfield, N.J. “It uses a variety of skill sets—leadership skills, strategic thinking, detailed-oriented. I have a CMM, which helps me provide a variety of services on a variety of levels for my clients.”

    The report also details many facts of the industry, from median income ($45,260 in 2010) to a first-hand account of what a planner’s role entails.

    Barry Zidel, principal for Meeting Connections Inc., says meeting planning is not like editing a film.

    "You can't go back and make edits or changes. You’ve got to be sharp and reactive, immediately, to deal with stuff that comes up on a daily basis,” Zidel said. “Based on that situation, it’s pretty fulfilling, at least to me. It’s not like being a doctor or something like that, where it’s a matter of life or death. But in terms of fulfillment, it’s pretty terrific.”

    The report also breaks down the logistics and execution behind the annual South by Southwest (SXSW) conference and festival, with comments from Executive Director Mike Shea—an event more fully profiled recently in a case study by One+

    (Reporting by Stephen Peters.)




  • Posted by Jason Hensel at
    12:00AM 03/16/2012 2 Comments

    Collaboration Leads to an Increase in Overconfidence

    From the corporate boardroom to the kitchen table, important decisions are often made in collaboration. But are two—or three or five—heads better than one? Not always, according to new research from the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School. 

    “People who make judgments by working with someone else are more confident in those judgments. As a result they take less input from other people”—and this myopia wipes out any advantage a pair may have over an individual, says psychologist Julia A. Minson, who conducted the study with Jennifer S. Mueller. “The collaborative process itself is the problem.” 

    The findings appear in the journal Psychological Science, published by the Association for Psychological Science.

    To test the hypothesis that confidence born of collaboration takes a toll on the quality of judgment, Minson and Mueller asked 252 people to estimate nine quantities related to U.S. geography, demographics and commerce, either individually or in pairs after discussion. They were then offered the estimates of other individuals and pairs and allowed to revise their own; the final estimates therefore could come from the efforts of two to four people. To sweeten the pot, participants earned a US$30 bonus for each of two estimation rounds, but lost $1 for each percentage point their answer deviated from correct. Individuals also rated their confidence in their judgments.

    The results: People working with a partner were more confident in their estimates and significantly less willing to take outside advice. The pairs’ guesses were marginally more accurate than those of the individuals at first. But after revision (or lack thereof), that difference was gone. Even the combined judgments of four people yielded no better results than those of two or three. Finally, the researchers found that had the pairs yielded to outside input, their estimates would have been significantly more accurate. Their confidence was costly.

    So should we toss out teamwork? No, says Minson, but since collaboration is expensive and time consuming, managers should use it efficiently. For one thing, a group of 10 is not 10 times better. 

    “Mathematically, you get the biggest bang from the buck going from one decision-maker to two," Minson said. "For each additional person, that benefit drops off in a downward sloping curve.” 

    Most important is awareness of the costs of teamwork. 

    “If people become aware that collaboration leads to an increase in overconfidence, you can set up ways to mitigate it," Minson said. "Teams could be urged to consider and process each others’ inputs more thoroughly.”

    The same goes for a couple choosing a mortgage or a car, Minson says. 

    “Just because you make a decision with someone else and you feel good about it, don’t be so sure that you’ve solved the problem and you don’t need help from anybody else.”

    (Story materials provided by the Association for Psychological Science.)




  • Posted by Jessie States at
    12:00AM 03/09/2012 0 Comments

    Travel Outpaces U.S. Economy by 34 Percent

    Travel Employment Outpaces Rest of U.S. Economy by 34 Percent
    Travel Industry Has Recovered More Than Half of Jobs Lost During Recession
    WASHINGTON, DC – David Huether, senior vice president of economics and research at the U.S. Travel Association, provides analysis on today's Labor Department report on February 2012 employment numbers:
    "This February, the number of workers employed directly in the travel industry increased by 8,000 to 7.6 million. The major increases in travel jobs were in restaurants, lodging, and amusements/gambling/recreation industries. Last month's employment rise marked the eleventh increase in the past 12 months for the travel industry.
    "Since February 2011, travel employment has increased by 129,000. And since the employment recovery began, the travel industry has created more than 250,000 new jobs, accounting for more than seven percent of overall job growth since early 2010. This is primarily due to the fact that the pace of job creation in the travel industry has exceeded that of the rest of the economy by 34 percent.
    "As a result of this faster job growth, the travel industry has now recovered more than half of the 496,000 jobs lost during the great recession, while the rest of the economy has made up just 39 percent.
    "The economy created 227,000 total jobs in February while the unemployment rate remained unchanged at 8.3 percent. While the overall pace of jobs growth decelerated a bit from the 284,000 gain in January, part of this was due to a 61,000 upward revision in January employment, nearly a quarter of which was due to 14,000 more jobs in the travel industry."
    Today's travel employment numbers echo positive news in export numbers for the industry, which improved to $12.9 billion in January.

    The number of workers employed directly in the U.S. travel industry increased by 8,000 to 7.6 million in February mainly in the restaurant, lodging and amusements-gambling-recreation industries, marking the 11th increase in the past 12 months for the travel industry, according to the U.S. Labor Department.

    Since February 2011, travel employment has increased by 129,000, and since the employment recovery began, the travel industry has created more than 250,000 new jobs, accounting for more than 7 percent of overall job growth since early 2010. This is primarily due to the fact that the pace of job creation in the travel industry has exceeded that of the rest of the economy by 34 percent.

    As a result of this faster job growth, the travel industry has now recovered more than half of the 496,000 jobs lost during the great recession, while the rest of the economy has made up just 39 percent.

    The economy created 227,000 total jobs in February, while the unemployment rate remained unchanged at 8.3 percent. While the overall pace of jobs growth decelerated a bit from the 284,000 gain in January, part of this was due to a 61,000 upward revision in January employment, nearly a quarter of which was due to 14,000 more jobs in the travel industry."

    Today's travel employment numbers echo positive news in export numbers for the industry, which improved to $12.9 billion in January.

    —Courtesy U.S. Travel Association


    • Email
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • Del.icio.us
    • Digg It!
    • StumbleUpon
    • Technorati



  • Posted by Jason Hensel at
    12:00AM 03/07/2012 2 Comments

    Ambition Doesn't Always Equal a Successful Life

    I'm going to begin by saying there's nothing wrong with ambition. If you want a corner office, a seat at the table, or any other achievement that proves you've arrived, then go for it. How you want to live your life is your own doing. However, I will say that ambition doesn't always equal success.

    According to a new study forthcoming in the Journal of Applied Psychology, ambitious people are barely happier than less ambitious people. 

    “If ambition has its positive effects, and in terms of career success it certainly seems that it does, our study also suggests that it carries with it some cost,” said Timothy Judge, a professor of management at the University of Notre Dame’s Mendoza College of Business. “Despite their many accomplishments, ambitious people are only slightly happier than their less-ambitious counterparts, and they actually live somewhat shorter lives.”

    Judge tracked 717 high-ability people over seven decades, measuring ambition during all phases of their lives. The individuals' education levels ranged from Ivy League schools to high school diplomas. 

    “Ambitious kids had higher educational attainment, attended highly esteemed universities, worked in more prestigious occupations and earned more,” Judge said. “So, it would seem that they are poised to ‘have it all.’ However, we determined that ambition has a much weaker effect on life satisfaction and actually a slightly negative impact on longevity (how long people lived). So, yes, ambitious people do achieve more successful careers, but that doesn’t seem to translate into leading happier or healthier lives.”

    Judge's research, however, didn't show the reason why ambitious people have shorter lives.

    “Perhaps the investments they make in their careers come at the expense of the things we know affect longevity: healthy behaviors, stable relationships and deep social networks,” he said. “If your biggest wish for your children is that they lead happy and healthy lives, you might not want to overemphasize professional success. There are limits to what our ambitions bring us—or our children.”

    How ambitious are you? How do you measure personal or professional success? Please let us know in the comments. 




  • Posted by Jason Hensel at
    12:00AM 03/07/2012 0 Comments

    Follow This Advice If You Want Unhappy Employees

    The Washington Post published an interesting story yesterday: "How to completely, utterly destroy an employee's work life." 

    Yesss...go on...

    Teresa Amabile, a professor and director of research at Harvard Business School, and Steven Kramer, a developmental psychologist and researcher, have studied for more than 15 years what makes people happy and engaged at work. In turn, they learned how to keep them unhappy. 

    The No. 1 way to make employees miserable is to keep them from making progress in meaningful work.

    "People want to make a valuable contribution, and feel great when they make progress toward doing so," Amabile and Kramer wrote. "Knowing this progress principle is the first step to knowing how to destroy an employee’s work life."  

    Another way to wreck an employee's work life is to block progress on projects. 

    "Every day, you’ll see dozens of ways to inhibit substantial forward movement on your subordinates’ most important efforts," Amabile and Kramer wrote. "Goal-setting is a great place to start. Give conflicting goals, change them as frequently as possible, and allow people no autonomy in meeting them."

    If you're truly devious and you want to destroy your employees' work lives, check out the story for more ways to do so. 

    Have you done these things to your employees (not on purpose, of course)? Have you had these things done to you? Please let us know in the comments.  




  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. Next Page