Log in to your account
 
Professional Development

Go Back

Positive Fantasies Lead People to Acquire Biased Info

A new study has found that when we fantasize about dream vacations before they are possible, we tend to overlook the negatives—thus influencing our decision-making down the line.

"We were interested in the effects of positive fantasies—what happens when people imagine an idealized, best-case-scenario version of the future, compared to when they imagine a less idealized version,” said Heather Barry Kappes of New York University, co-author of the study published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. "This is one of the first papers to examine selective information acquisition at this early stage, before people are seriously considering a possibility.”

For example, imagine that you would like to take a trip to Australia this year but think you are very unlikely to do so—you have no more vacation time left, cannot afford it or would rather save up for a new car. But you still daydream about how nice it would be to see the Australian Outback and relax on the beaches, perhaps without thinking about the long plane ride there or the poisonous animals. Those daydreams, Kappes says, have powerful effects.

To test those effects, Kappes and co-author Gabriele Oettingen asked people to imagine a particular future about one of three topics: wearing glamorous high-heeled shoes, making money in the stock market or taking a vacation. To induce positive fantasies for each topic, the study participants were prompted to think about how great it would be to do each activity. In the control condition, participants also imagined experiencing the future, but were prompted to think about the negatives as well, with questions like "Would it really be so great?” In both conditions, participants wrote down what they were thinking for the researchers to ensure they were engaged in the imagery.

After that exercise, the researchers offered the participants a choice of different types of information. For example, participants could browse a website describing the positive and negative health consequences of wearing high heels, and researchers noted how much more time they spent reading about positive versus negative consequences. Or, they could choose which of five (fictitious) Tripadvisor.com reviews they wanted to read, and researchers recorded whether they chose one that was more pro-trip (i.e., five stars) or con-trip (i.e., one star).

Kappes' team found that for each topic, imagining the idealized version made people prefer to learn about the pros rather than the cons of the future event. 

"These effects are pronounced when people are not seriously considering pursuing a given future,” Kappes said.

The work has important implications for even the most deliberate of decision-makers. 

"When people are seriously considering implementing a decision like taking a trip, they often engage in careful deliberations about the pros versus cons,” Kappes said. "Our work suggests that before getting to this point, positive fantasies might lead people to acquire biased information—to learn more about the pros rather than the cons. Thus, even if people deliberate very carefully on the information they've acquired, they could still make poor decisions.”

People need to be aware of these effects to ensure that they acquire balanced information before it is time to make a decision, she says. The study also contributes to a larger body of research about the powerful consequences of mental imagery—and shows that positive thinking may not always be best. 

"Although there are benefits to imagining a positive future, there are also drawbacks, and it's important to recognize them in order to most effectively pursue our goals,” she said.

(Story materials provided by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology)

Conversation (3)
  • Kare Anderson June 14, 2012

    The findings in this powerful post complement the research of Daniel Gilbert, author of Stumbling on Happiness, who found we are not too astute about picturing how happy we will be in the future. Relatedly our memory of an experience can be disproportionately shaped by what happened at the end of it, research has found from two disparate sources: vacations and colonoscopies.... if we had a pleasant time at the end it tends to overshadow what happened at the beginning in our remembrance of the event....

    Those interested in the cues that influence  our perceptions and choices might also be interested in the books, Nudge, Sway, Situations Matter and The Paradox of Choice. In my speaking program (Becoming More Quotable and Connected) I incorporate some of these findings and suggest an approach to becoming one of a kind, turning the page to the chapter of the adventure story you want to live.... with others

  • Bridget DiCello June 30, 2012

    Not so! I think this article does not give professionals enough credit and appears to have a weak study associated with it.  High heeled shoes?  Thinking about positive possibilities doesn't mean you ignore reality.  People have the incredible potential to weigh all pros and cons, even if they prefer to focus on what is possible.  Great thinkers are those who move this great country forward! 

    Thinking about the dream vacation to Australia means you have the conversations, make the connections and learn more about related topics.  Then, we the opportunity does arise, you see it when you might not have otherwise, others may assist you when they wouldn't if you weren't talking about it, and blessings come from unexpected places. 

    Forward thinking determination is not shallow.  Read about the Stockholm Paradox in Good to Great by Jim Collins. 

    This article is a real kick in the teeth to those focused on professional development.

  • Ken Clayton July 03, 2012

    It's always interesting to go back to the source when possible and compare that with the report. In this case, there was an article in the 'Journal of Experimental Social Psychology' covering this topic. One assumes that it has been peer-reviewed but I was surprised that the results were achieved by recording the systolic blood pressure of participants during the experiment as a measure of 'the effect of positive fantasies on energy'. Perhaps that's a reasonable way of measuring an individual's energy levels but, having read some of the paper (I admit that I haven't read it all because there's a limit to how much academic fairy dust I can take in one sitting) I have to say that I don't believe that it has any relevance whatever to the planning of meetings. If anybody insists that it does, perhaps they should make a comparison between this and other papers setting out the beneficial consequences of positive visualisation.

    And Kare, the idea that there can be any pleasurable outcome from a colonoscopy is odd, unless you're referring to the news that, following the procedure, the medics can say that there is nothing wrong with you.

Post a comment


  1. Formatting options
       
     
     
     
     
       
  2. Captcha Image